meaning of contested decision

The decision can either be made at the final hearing or a later public meeting.
They have three parts:.The Sun (2010)Her endorsement tipped the balance in nomination contest after nomination contest.Such a construction would flood agency proceedings with hearsay ainst this background, it is clear that the "right to present his case or defense by oral or documentary evidence" does not extend to present evidence in affidavit or other written form so as to deprive.Times, Sunday Times (2014).Hopkins, Tom The Guide to Greatness in Sales (1994)It was about competition: about contest, rivalry and battle.Times, Sunday Times (2010)The selection contest had been due to take place last night but has been postponed after a row between local members and the party's central command.These examples have been automatically selected and may contain sensitive content.
The Sun (2009)His goal signalled the end of the game as a contest.
Times, Sunday Times (2009) Atlantic City provides the setting for the story of two brothers who enter the biggest mixed martial arts contest in history.
But the Attorney Generals Manual makes it clear that neither the relaxation of the rules of evidence, nor the admission of documentary evidence, may swallow up the right of cross examination.The United States must produce its witnesses for cross examination.Times, Sunday Times (2015) Last month he called for the contest to be suspended because of suspected infiltration.Hearing: where witnesses are called to testify and evidence is submitted.Download a PDF of Section.1.Contested cases are used to set electric and gas kohls coupon code free shipping october 2017 rates, to determine whether a securities broker should have his or her license revoked, to decide the route of a power line, to judge the validity of fines assessed against nursing homes, to grant or deny.These hearings are like an informal court proceeding.Administrative Procedure Act, issued as a contemporaneous explanation of the Act, emphasizes the importance of the right of cross examination in adjudicative hearings to assure fundamental fairness.Section 7(c) provides further that "Every party shall have the right to present his case or defense by oral or documentary evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence, and to conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.Administrative action that affects a large number of people is more commonly accomplished through a rulemaking proceeding.




[L_RANDNUM-10-999]